In this response, we address the three main comments by Tsurutani et al. (2018, http://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024779) namely, unusually high plasma density, interplanetary magnetic field intensity, and fast storm recovery phase. The authors agree that there is room to improve the modeling by taking into account these comments and other aspects that were not fully explored during our initial work. We are already in the process of undertaking a more comprehensive modeling project
We present evidence that the mechanism proposed in Teles et al. [Phys. Rev. E 92, 020101 (2015)], re...
Geomagnetic perturbation is an important aspect to determine the capability of a 3-D MHD model in pr...
We present evidence that the mechanism proposed in Teles et al. [Phys. Rev. E 92, 020101 (2015)], re...
International audienceAn alternative scenario to the Ngwira et al. (2014, https://doi-org.insu.bib.c...
International audienceAmong the 18 supposed slow mode transition (SMT) cases identified by [1990, 19...
We respond to Dikpati et al.'s criticism of our recent solar dynamo model. A different treatment of ...
A Comment on the Letter by G.G. Howes, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-9007 100, 065004 (2008)10.1103/Phy...
© 2020 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general ...
LC12) we documented the three-dimensional (3D) struc-ture in Hurricane Frances’s (2004) boundary lay...
International audienceIn their comment, Lesur and Wardinski [2009] questiontwo different aspects of ...
In their preceding comment on our paper [Matthaeus et al., 1994] (hereinafter reffered to as paper 1...
In their comment, Žagar and Szunyogh raised concerns about a recent study by Zhang et al. that exami...
tions to our interpretation of dayside auroral transients and associated azimuthal flow bursts in te...
Reviewer's comments are inset. Replies are full width. This review refers to the originally sub...
Pizzamei et al. (2005; hereafter P05) perform an idealized modelling study to examine possible mecha...
We present evidence that the mechanism proposed in Teles et al. [Phys. Rev. E 92, 020101 (2015)], re...
Geomagnetic perturbation is an important aspect to determine the capability of a 3-D MHD model in pr...
We present evidence that the mechanism proposed in Teles et al. [Phys. Rev. E 92, 020101 (2015)], re...
International audienceAn alternative scenario to the Ngwira et al. (2014, https://doi-org.insu.bib.c...
International audienceAmong the 18 supposed slow mode transition (SMT) cases identified by [1990, 19...
We respond to Dikpati et al.'s criticism of our recent solar dynamo model. A different treatment of ...
A Comment on the Letter by G.G. Howes, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-9007 100, 065004 (2008)10.1103/Phy...
© 2020 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general ...
LC12) we documented the three-dimensional (3D) struc-ture in Hurricane Frances’s (2004) boundary lay...
International audienceIn their comment, Lesur and Wardinski [2009] questiontwo different aspects of ...
In their preceding comment on our paper [Matthaeus et al., 1994] (hereinafter reffered to as paper 1...
In their comment, Žagar and Szunyogh raised concerns about a recent study by Zhang et al. that exami...
tions to our interpretation of dayside auroral transients and associated azimuthal flow bursts in te...
Reviewer's comments are inset. Replies are full width. This review refers to the originally sub...
Pizzamei et al. (2005; hereafter P05) perform an idealized modelling study to examine possible mecha...
We present evidence that the mechanism proposed in Teles et al. [Phys. Rev. E 92, 020101 (2015)], re...
Geomagnetic perturbation is an important aspect to determine the capability of a 3-D MHD model in pr...
We present evidence that the mechanism proposed in Teles et al. [Phys. Rev. E 92, 020101 (2015)], re...